Skip to main content

The conundrum of free speech


You've got a nerve, coming into this muhalla! I know you: my father knows you: everyone knows you're a Hindu!!' screams the Midget Queen.  Boys in their school whites and snake buckle are joining in, 'Hindu! Hindu! Hindu! From his window Midget Queen’s father joins in, hurling abuses at the new target… ‘Mother rapers! Violator of our daughters…!’ and the schoolboys have begun to chant 'Ra-pist! Ra-pist! Ray-ray-ray-pist!' without really knowing what they're saying. Their victim, Lifafa Das is trying to get away but by now he is surrounded by voices filled with blood- This episode from Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children, placed in the turmoil and unrest of partition, portrays the complex magic of words. Words have strange power; they can stir emotions and cause commotions in turbulent times. And these are turbulent times.

It seems as if speech has been given a free hand to prey on the life of heads that donned skullcaps, shoulders that were draped in saffron clothes and eyes that were as blue as the Kashmiri sky in the form of hate speech, misinformation, and fake news. The monster of free speech killed them! But free speech is not a monster, it the jewel that graces almost all the constitutions, it is a guaranteed human right. It is a virtue! Something that aids the social and political development of social groups and individuals alike. This argument has been put forth when Twitter chose to hide one of American President, Donald Trump’s tweet behind a warning that the tweet “glorified violence” and fact-checked another of his tweet urging people to “get the facts”. Twitter’s censorship in the face of distortions, misrepresentation and outright lies have been called out by many for curbing free speech. Facebook chose not to act on any of his identical statements posted on their platform.

Free speech might have been a virtue seventy years back when the list of human rights was being prepared. Now, it has become the Harvey Dent of the Dark Knight; two-faced. And the flip side of free speech is ugly. Words can inspire but words can also destroy. Like a curse. The time has come to make a definite move from free speech to responsible speech. Free speech has become so enormous and mighty that like giant Goliath- it has become blind and nearsighted. There has to be some David to relieve the Goliath of its miseries and that David is responsible speech. The Internet has been lauded as a bastion of free speech but it is also the breeding ground of misinformation and hate speech. Minimum government censorship needs to put on social media platforms. While some argue that this may lead to the politicization of the internet, it needs to be understood that only opinions are political in nature. Facts are not, they are objective, at least once they used to be. The society has to agree on some bare minimum- the ground rules that bind us all, before the social fabric starts to wither under tension from social media. Anything carrying the prefix ‘free’ always has a hidden toll; the toll of free speech is the life of Lifafa Das. Responsible speech is the way forward and this long march to responsibility needs to start now.

 *Wikimedia Commons; Madelgarius


Comments

  1. Your opinions regarding Free Speech truly justify your feelings :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just wanted to showcase the other side of free speech that has been conveniently ignored. Glad that you could connect with the write up. 😃

      Delete
  2. The improvement in your writing is clear as crystal. Great Job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind words brother. ♥️

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ms. Marvel adds the jewel of South Asia to MCU’s crown of diversity

For Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) ‘superhero’ has a standard definition. They are intelligent, sedulous, good looking, sacrificing, male, white and the hope of humanity. The conception is so immutable that even though recently there have been number of female characters portraying such characters, we still don’t have a word for female super'hero'? Merriam Webster says it is ‘superheroine’, as it logically should be. But it hasn’t really caught up and also it does not have that ‘superhero waali feeling’ as is also the case with ‘superhuman’, which misses the concept of ‘protagonist’ altogether. Even the storyline of these superhero movies is quite standard. A city in the US is in danger. It falls in the hands of a superhero, as defined above, to save millions of lives because it is his destiny to do so. A fight ensues between the superhero and the villain amongst the high-rise buildings of a metropolitan American city. It is the fantasy story of an ordinary westerner which is

Thanos is a utilitarian!

Image Courtesy- TeePublic If a close analysis is undertaken of all superhero movies, then a common denominator underlying all plots will be discovered. Every superhero tale has a moral dimension, but it is quintessentially limited to the protagonist. That is to say, the superhero alone has the might of the right with him. Invariably accompanying him is the badness of the villain. Badness in the sense, the values that he stands for and things he fights for. This element is indispensable because goodness is relative. You need to give something worse to the viewer, to which he can compare the alleged good part and arrive at the conclusion which storyteller wants to sell; the superhero was indeed good! This is the cliché tale of every superhero movie and Marvel Entertainment has been no different about it. Start watching Marvel Universe movies starting from Iron Man (2008), Captain America, Thor, Avengers, and all their sequels and you will possibly get my point. But in Avenger