Skip to main content

The conundrum of free speech


You've got a nerve, coming into this muhalla! I know you: my father knows you: everyone knows you're a Hindu!!' screams the Midget Queen.  Boys in their school whites and snake buckle are joining in, 'Hindu! Hindu! Hindu! From his window Midget Queen’s father joins in, hurling abuses at the new target… ‘Mother rapers! Violator of our daughters…!’ and the schoolboys have begun to chant 'Ra-pist! Ra-pist! Ray-ray-ray-pist!' without really knowing what they're saying. Their victim, Lifafa Das is trying to get away but by now he is surrounded by voices filled with blood- This episode from Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children, placed in the turmoil and unrest of partition, portrays the complex magic of words. Words have strange power; they can stir emotions and cause commotions in turbulent times. And these are turbulent times.

It seems as if speech has been given a free hand to prey on the life of heads that donned skullcaps, shoulders that were draped in saffron clothes and eyes that were as blue as the Kashmiri sky in the form of hate speech, misinformation, and fake news. The monster of free speech killed them! But free speech is not a monster, it the jewel that graces almost all the constitutions, it is a guaranteed human right. It is a virtue! Something that aids the social and political development of social groups and individuals alike. This argument has been put forth when Twitter chose to hide one of American President, Donald Trump’s tweet behind a warning that the tweet “glorified violence” and fact-checked another of his tweet urging people to “get the facts”. Twitter’s censorship in the face of distortions, misrepresentation and outright lies have been called out by many for curbing free speech. Facebook chose not to act on any of his identical statements posted on their platform.

Free speech might have been a virtue seventy years back when the list of human rights was being prepared. Now, it has become the Harvey Dent of the Dark Knight; two-faced. And the flip side of free speech is ugly. Words can inspire but words can also destroy. Like a curse. The time has come to make a definite move from free speech to responsible speech. Free speech has become so enormous and mighty that like giant Goliath- it has become blind and nearsighted. There has to be some David to relieve the Goliath of its miseries and that David is responsible speech. The Internet has been lauded as a bastion of free speech but it is also the breeding ground of misinformation and hate speech. Minimum government censorship needs to put on social media platforms. While some argue that this may lead to the politicization of the internet, it needs to be understood that only opinions are political in nature. Facts are not, they are objective, at least once they used to be. The society has to agree on some bare minimum- the ground rules that bind us all, before the social fabric starts to wither under tension from social media. Anything carrying the prefix ‘free’ always has a hidden toll; the toll of free speech is the life of Lifafa Das. Responsible speech is the way forward and this long march to responsibility needs to start now.

 *Wikimedia Commons; Madelgarius


Comments

  1. Your opinions regarding Free Speech truly justify your feelings :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just wanted to showcase the other side of free speech that has been conveniently ignored. Glad that you could connect with the write up. ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

      Delete
  2. The improvement in your writing is clear as crystal. Great Job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind words brother. ♥️

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Write Essays For Writing Competitions: I Don’t Know; Just sharing my thoughts

Writing an analytical legal essay is a formidable task. Even a thought about it evokes a flurry of questions- What should be the topic of the essay? What competition/journal/blog should  I write it for? Where to start? What should be the structure of the essay? Attempting to answer the perennial stream of such questions, I bring to you a guest post from a dear friend and a prolific writer, Lokesh Vyas. Sharing his last name with the author of the great Indian epic- Mahabharat, Lokesh is a regular contributor to IP blogs like SpicyIP and IPRMENTLAW. He has also won multiple prestigious essay competition including the inaugural edition of the Prof. Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition, and the ATRIP Essay Competition, 2023. Lokesh is currently pursuing his doctorate at Sciences Po, Paris .   How to Write Essays For Writing Competitions: I Don’t Know; Just sharing my thoughts Despite the lofty title of this post, which might hint that I'm some kind of sage (an “essay-sage” of s...

Why you must read 'Sophie's World'

Most probably, the revelation of the full title of the book will be sufficient for some to grab a copy of it straightaway. Jostein Gaarder’s Sophie’s World: A Novel About the History of Philosophy is a Norwegian classic published in 1991. For those who do not find the idea of narrating the ‘history of philosophy’ in a ‘fiction novel’ compelling in itself and are still reading this blog; the book has a lot more to offer. Sophie’s World , as the name suggests, revolves around the events that take place in the life of 14 years old Sophie Amundsen as her 15 th birthday approaches. The book opens with the perplexed thoughts of Sophie when her friend suggests that the human mind is like an advanced computer; she wonders ‘surely a person is more than a piece of hardware?’ And then Gaarder knits a whole new world around her; I mean, he literally weaves a ‘new world’. In Sophie’s World, two threads run simultaneously. First, there is the story of Sophie & the mysterious Alberto Knox, fr...