Skip to main content

Why you must read 'Sophie's World'

Most probably, the revelation of the full title of the book will be sufficient for some to grab a copy of it straightaway. Jostein Gaarder’s Sophie’s World: A Novel About the History of Philosophy is a Norwegian classic published in 1991. For those who do not find the idea of narrating the ‘history of philosophy’ in a ‘fiction novel’ compelling in itself and are still reading this blog; the book has a lot more to offer. Sophie’s World, as the name suggests, revolves around the events that take place in the life of 14 years old Sophie Amundsen as her 15th birthday approaches. The book opens with the perplexed thoughts of Sophie when her friend suggests that the human mind is like an advanced computer; she wonders ‘surely a person is more than a piece of hardware?’ And then Gaarder knits a whole new world around her; I mean, he literally weaves a ‘new world’. In Sophie’s World, two threads run simultaneously. First, there is the story of Sophie & the mysterious Alberto Knox, from whom she randomly starts recieving letters containing philosophy lessons. The second thread is the history of philosophy itself. And when these two seemingly unrelated threads intermingle with each other, they unfold one of the finest philosophical thrillers ever written. The genre of the book, in my opinion, would be ‘philosophical suspense’ if there exists any such genre in the first place.

Taking into account the subconscious levels and dimensions at which the plot of the novel works, it would not be inappropriate to call Sophie’s World the Matrix or the Inception of the philosophical world. Gaarder’s ingenuity in Sophie’s World is commendable. In the novel, Gaarder analyses various strands of philosophy, like the Greek, Hindu, Christian, Buddhist and, of course, the overarching modern European philosophy. It is an account of 3000 years of philosophical inquiry. Sophie’s World is full of existential questions like- Who are we? Where does the world come from? What is a human being? Is there life after death? Giving no false hopes, the novel does not attempt to answer any of these questions. But the book does highlight the importance of posing such questions and contemplating them nevertheless. Gaarder has put in a brave attempt to portray that philosophy cannot be discarded as a fruitless pursuit. Although, the most enjoyable feature of the novel is the innocent curiosity of the young protagonist and the clever narrative that Gaarder builds around her to pique it. Sophie’s World is fun to read and it pushes the limits of the reader’s imagination. Moreover, for older readers, it will also act as a synopsis of the basic knowledge that they gained in their schools and probably left it there as it is- untouched.

For a change, the language is simple in a work translated to English (it was originally written in Norwegian). Even though a philosophical book which requires constant reflection, thinking, and introspection, the novel can, more or less, be characterized as a smooth reading experience (just don’t just skim through the book- read and reflect, please!).


Comments

  1. This is such a well written and concise review. Enjoyed reading this. I have read The Solitaire Mystery and I feel he has a penchant for creating worlds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind words Aakanksha. I guess he does, and how beautifully he creates them! Although, I have not read Solitaire Mystery, now it is on my reading list.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ms. Marvel adds the jewel of South Asia to MCU’s crown of diversity

For Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) ‘superhero’ has a standard definition. They are intelligent, sedulous, good looking, sacrificing, male, white and the hope of humanity. The conception is so immutable that even though recently there have been number of female characters portraying such characters, we still don’t have a word for female super'hero'? Merriam Webster says it is ‘superheroine’, as it logically should be. But it hasn’t really caught up and also it does not have that ‘superhero waali feeling’ as is also the case with ‘superhuman’, which misses the concept of ‘protagonist’ altogether. Even the storyline of these superhero movies is quite standard. A city in the US is in danger. It falls in the hands of a superhero, as defined above, to save millions of lives because it is his destiny to do so. A fight ensues between the superhero and the villain amongst the high-rise buildings of a metropolitan American city. It is the fantasy story of an ordinary westerner which is

Thanos is a utilitarian!

Image Courtesy- TeePublic If a close analysis is undertaken of all superhero movies, then a common denominator underlying all plots will be discovered. Every superhero tale has a moral dimension, but it is quintessentially limited to the protagonist. That is to say, the superhero alone has the might of the right with him. Invariably accompanying him is the badness of the villain. Badness in the sense, the values that he stands for and things he fights for. This element is indispensable because goodness is relative. You need to give something worse to the viewer, to which he can compare the alleged good part and arrive at the conclusion which storyteller wants to sell; the superhero was indeed good! This is the cliché tale of every superhero movie and Marvel Entertainment has been no different about it. Start watching Marvel Universe movies starting from Iron Man (2008), Captain America, Thor, Avengers, and all their sequels and you will possibly get my point. But in Avenger

The conundrum of free speech

‘ You've got a nerve, coming into this muhalla! I know you: my father knows you: everyone knows you're a Hindu!! ' screams the Midget Queen.  Boys in their school whites and snake buckle are joining in, 'Hindu! Hindu! Hindu! From his window Midget Queen’s father joins in, hurling abuses at the new target… ‘Mother rapers! Violator of our daughters…!’ and the schoolboys have begun to chant 'Ra-pist! Ra-pist! Ray-ray-ray-pist!' without really knowing what they're saying. Their victim, Lifafa Das is trying to get away but by now he is surrounded by voices filled with blood- This episode from Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children , placed in the turmoil and unrest of partition, portrays the complex magic of words. Words have strange power; they can stir emotions and cause commotions in turbulent times. And these are turbulent times. It seems as if speech has been given a free hand to prey on the life of heads that donned skullcaps, shoulders that were draped i