Why you should read 'Crime and Punishment'

The book Crime and Punishment, written by Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky is based on a random murder of an old moneylender by a former student of law. But the book is not a crime thriller, for the murder takes place in the first part in a seven-part long storyline. Regarded as Dostoevsky’s magnum opus and one of the best literary works of Russian literature, Crime and Punishment offers a view into Raskolnikov’s mind (the murderer and the protagonist). The novel can be best characterized as a psychological thriller. In his book, Dostoevsky grapples with questions like- what pushes a man into committing a hideous crime as murder in cold blood? Unlike the ideal state of the human mind and soul, as is often depicted, Crime and Punishment shows the turbulent state of the mind of Raskolnikov and the contradictions within his soul- completely naked. In the plot, Raskolnikov, a bright young student, has to drop out of university because of the lack of money to support his studies. Sinking into an abyss of hunger and fever, he decides to murder and rob the moneylender to whom he pawns his valuable belongings. Having convinced himself that he has a ‘right to kill such a louse and old crone’, Raskolnikov puts the axe into the feeble body of his victim, without remorse or regret.

Staged like a play, the novel offers a holistic view of the city of St. Petersburg but underlying every scene are the thoughts of the murderer and his torn apart soul. Dostoevsky paints a very gloomy picture of the 19th century St. Petersburg, embellished with its stifling streets and abject poverty. In Crime and Punishment, the fictional suffering becomes almost palpable for the reader. Page by page, scene by scene the book reveals the character of Raskolnikov- a rational man, an egoist, who starts to think of himself as the benefactor of mankind. The book allows the reader to peek into the consciousness of the protagonist which starts to engulf him like fever even before he commits the heinous act. But the real art of Dostoevsky lies in combining the opposites in a perfectly balanced manner. Opposites like the oppressor and the victim combined in a single fictional character, harmoniously. The only drawback of Crime and Punishment that can be repulsive for the reader is the length of the novel (a massive account of 720 pages). But the effort in treading through the book is worth it. As even if the book is one hundred and fifty years old, it leaps out of its time and confronts us as if it has not yet said its final word. And so the magic of Crime and Punishment persists!

* picture credit: Spencer Baum

**picture credit: Robin R. Bates

Comments

Ms. Marvel adds the jewel of South Asia to MCU’s crown of diversity

For Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) ‘superhero’ has a standard definition. They are intelligent, sedulous, good looking, sacrificing, male, white and the hope of humanity. The conception is so immutable that even though recently there have been number of female characters portraying such characters, we still don’t have a word for female super'hero'? Merriam Webster says it is ‘superheroine’, as it logically should be. But it hasn’t really caught up and also it does not have that ‘superhero waali feeling’ as is also the case with ‘superhuman’, which misses the concept of ‘protagonist’ altogether. Even the storyline of these superhero movies is quite standard. A city in the US is in danger. It falls in the hands of a superhero, as defined above, to save millions of lives because it is his destiny to do so. A fight ensues between the superhero and the villain amongst the high-rise buildings of a metropolitan American city. It is the fantasy story of an ordinary westerner which is

Thanos is a utilitarian!

Image Courtesy- TeePublic If a close analysis is undertaken of all superhero movies, then a common denominator underlying all plots will be discovered. Every superhero tale has a moral dimension, but it is quintessentially limited to the protagonist. That is to say, the superhero alone has the might of the right with him. Invariably accompanying him is the badness of the villain. Badness in the sense, the values that he stands for and things he fights for. This element is indispensable because goodness is relative. You need to give something worse to the viewer, to which he can compare the alleged good part and arrive at the conclusion which storyteller wants to sell; the superhero was indeed good! This is the cliché tale of every superhero movie and Marvel Entertainment has been no different about it. Start watching Marvel Universe movies starting from Iron Man (2008), Captain America, Thor, Avengers, and all their sequels and you will possibly get my point. But in Avenger

The conundrum of free speech

‘ You've got a nerve, coming into this muhalla! I know you: my father knows you: everyone knows you're a Hindu!! ' screams the Midget Queen. Boys in their school whites and snake buckle are joining in, 'Hindu! Hindu! Hindu! From his window Midget Queen’s father joins in, hurling abuses at the new target… ‘Mother rapers! Violator of our daughters…!’ and the schoolboys have begun to chant 'Ra-pist! Ra-pist! Ray-ray-ray-pist!' without really knowing what they're saying. Their victim, Lifafa Das is trying to get away but by now he is surrounded by voices filled with blood- This episode from Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children , placed in the turmoil and unrest of partition, portrays the complex magic of words. Words have strange power; they can stir emotions and cause commotions in turbulent times. And these are turbulent times. It seems as if speech has been given a free hand to prey on the life of heads that donned skullcaps, shoulders that were draped i

A Law Student's Contention

Search This Blog