Skip to main content

Maybe Ambedkar Was Not The Father Of The Indian Constitution


Recently a rat race concluded amongst all the major political parties in commemorating ‘father of the Indian Constitution’ on his 127th Birth Aniversary a.k.a 'Ambedkar Jayanti'. Though there are gossips that it was solely to up-ease a substantial segment of voters in the country who take Dr. Ambedkar as their leader but as I said, just gossips. Before I begin advancing my contentions, lets me state some of the facts that even I for one cannot deny. That Dr. Ambedkar played a decisive role in the up easement of the ‘Scheduled Castes’( Scheduled Tribes are deliberately excluded here), In the eradication of untouchability and the making of the Constitution of India but here comes the problem, I certainly feel that the contribution of Dr. Ambedkar in the framing of the Constitution is a hyperbole.  He like many other members of Constituent Assembly played an important role but I doubt that he was anyway near to the role of a ‘Father’.

“I Came into Constituent Assembly just to safeguard the Interests of Scheduled Castes….” (The exclusion of ST’s again is deliberate on his part here)
In his final speech before the Constituent assembly on November 25th, 1949, he, the Chairperson of the Drafting Committee reiterated that his only object of being a member of Constituent Assembly was to safeguard the interests of Scheduled Castes. It is pertinent to mention here that Mr. Ambedkar was the leader of All India Scheduled Caste Federation and had every intention to boycott the Constituent Assembly because Mr. Ambedkar for one felt that an assembly arguing and shaping the future of India was a dangerous project (Dr. B.R. Ambedkar; Writings and Speeches, Vol. 1, pp. 360-1). So, basically making him the chairperson of the Drafting Committee was more like giving ‘candy’ to convince a displeased kid.

B.N. Rau is the neglected one….
B.N. Rau( extrme Right), an unsung diplomat and statesman, Image Courtesy: kenfolios.com

A guy goes around the world, goes through all the major Constitutions available at that time and reviews the working of those political systems where that Constitution has been in place, he consults all the legal luminaries across the globe. If someone can really be credited with the title of ‘Father of the Indian Constitution,’ it would be the Constitutional Advisor to Constituent Assembly, Mr. B.N. Rau. He was the one who submitted the draft of the Constitution which was later modified by the Drafting Committee lead by none other than Babasaheb. On the day of the Signing of the Constitution, the President of Constituent Assembly, Dr. Rajendra Prasad gave special mention to the unmatched efforts of B.N. Rau (Dr. Rajendra Prasad; Words of Freedom: Ideas of a Nation, p. 12). Even B.R. Ambedkar in his concluding speech divides the whole credit between Mr. B.N. Rau and Mr. S.N. Mukharjee, The chief Draftsmen of the Constitution but we barely know who they are or remember them.

Ambedkar submitted another document labeled as ‘Constitution of the United States of India’ which was rejected…
When Ambedkar became a part of the Constituent Assembly he brought with him his version of Indian Constitution on the behalf of All India Scheduled Caste Federation which was nearly rejected in its entirety. His narrow interests and motives can be ascertained from the fact that it was presented by him as ‘Memorandum on the safeguards for the Scheduled Casts’ (Dr. B.R. Ambedkar; States and Minorities: What are their rights and how to secure them in free India).

He wanted 'Separate Villages' for Scheduled Castes
We all are told that Jinnah wanted a separate nation for protecting the interests of Muslims but I guess people often forget that he was not the only one working on that line of demand. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar led All India Scheduled Casts Federation passed a resolution for ‘Separate Settlements’ for Scheduled Casts (B.R. Ambedkar; Writings and Speeches, Vol. 9, p. 393).  His demands were quite similar to the demands of Muslim League to protect the interest of his community at the cost of national interest (V.P. Menon; Transfer of Power, Vol VII, pp.197-98)

Against giving rights to Scheduled Tribes (ST’s)
Today we see that both Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes stand on the same pedestal in terms of Constitutional protection but this is not what was envisaged by Babasaheb.  He was strictly against conferring any right to ST’s and called them ‘Aboriginal Tribes.’ As quoted by Sudheen Kulkarni, Ambedkar was of the opinion that ST’s had not developed any political sense to make full use of their political opportunities and will easily become an instrument in the hands of majority doing no good to themselves.

“I shall be the first person to burn the Indian Constitution!” (Ambedkar in 1953, Rajya Sabha)
In 1953 during a Rajya Sabha Debate in a volte-face to his stand in Constituent Assembly he wanted that Power of Veto should be given to Governor against the State legislature. When his motion was declined he went on to say that he would be the first person to burn the Indian Constitution. He was not happy with the functioning of it after he could not enter Lok Sabha Twice after losing elections from two different places namely, Bombay and Bhandara in 1952 general Elections (Sudheen Kulkarini; Ambedkar the architect of the constitution? His words prove otherwise)

One thing that can be gathered from the above material for sure is that Indian Constitution was not the Brainchild of Mr. Ambedkar. He never wanted to be part of it, he was skeptical of its functioning and was never working for the interest of the whole nation but for a particular community. He made things much clearer by saying openly “I was a hack.  What I was asked to do, I did much against my will!” Even if he can be accepted as a father of Indian Constitution then he won't be amongst the best fathers for being so cruel to his child, our sacred document.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Write Essays For Writing Competitions: I Don’t Know; Just sharing my thoughts

Writing an analytical legal essay is a formidable task. Even a thought about it evokes a flurry of questions- What should be the topic of the essay? What competition/journal/blog should  I write it for? Where to start? What should be the structure of the essay? Attempting to answer the perennial stream of such questions, I bring to you a guest post from a dear friend and a prolific writer, Lokesh Vyas. Sharing his last name with the author of the great Indian epic- Mahabharat, Lokesh is a regular contributor to IP blogs like SpicyIP and IPRMENTLAW. He has also won multiple prestigious essay competition including the inaugural edition of the Prof. Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition, and the ATRIP Essay Competition, 2023. Lokesh is currently pursuing his doctorate at Sciences Po, Paris .   How to Write Essays For Writing Competitions: I Don’t Know; Just sharing my thoughts Despite the lofty title of this post, which might hint that I'm some kind of sage (an “essay-sage” of s...

The conundrum of free speech

‘ You've got a nerve, coming into this muhalla! I know you: my father knows you: everyone knows you're a Hindu!! ' screams the Midget Queen.  Boys in their school whites and snake buckle are joining in, 'Hindu! Hindu! Hindu! From his window Midget Queen’s father joins in, hurling abuses at the new target… ‘Mother rapers! Violator of our daughters…!’ and the schoolboys have begun to chant 'Ra-pist! Ra-pist! Ray-ray-ray-pist!' without really knowing what they're saying. Their victim, Lifafa Das is trying to get away but by now he is surrounded by voices filled with blood- This episode from Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children , placed in the turmoil and unrest of partition, portrays the complex magic of words. Words have strange power; they can stir emotions and cause commotions in turbulent times. And these are turbulent times. It seems as if speech has been given a free hand to prey on the life of heads that donned skullcaps, shoulders that were draped i...

Why you must read 'Sophie's World'

Most probably, the revelation of the full title of the book will be sufficient for some to grab a copy of it straightaway. Jostein Gaarder’s Sophie’s World: A Novel About the History of Philosophy is a Norwegian classic published in 1991. For those who do not find the idea of narrating the ‘history of philosophy’ in a ‘fiction novel’ compelling in itself and are still reading this blog; the book has a lot more to offer. Sophie’s World , as the name suggests, revolves around the events that take place in the life of 14 years old Sophie Amundsen as her 15 th birthday approaches. The book opens with the perplexed thoughts of Sophie when her friend suggests that the human mind is like an advanced computer; she wonders ‘surely a person is more than a piece of hardware?’ And then Gaarder knits a whole new world around her; I mean, he literally weaves a ‘new world’. In Sophie’s World, two threads run simultaneously. First, there is the story of Sophie & the mysterious Alberto Knox, fr...